Thursday, November 28, 2019

Abortion Debate Essays - Abortion Debate, Sexual Reproduction

Abortion Debate In Roman times, abortion and the destruction of unwanted children was permissible. As our civilization has aged, it seems that such acts were no longer acceptable by rational human beings, so that in 1948, Canada along with most other nations in the world signed a declaration of the United Nations promising every human being the right to life. The World Medical Association meeting in Geneva at the same time, stated that the utmost respect for human life was to be from the moment of conception. This declaration was re-affirmed when the World Medical Association met in Oslo in 1970. Should we go backwards in our concern for the life of an individual human being? The unborn human is still a human life and not all the wishful thinking of those advocating repeal of abortion laws can alter this. Those of us who would seek to protect the human who is still too small to cry aloud for it's own protection, have been accused of having a 19th Century approach to life in the last third of the 20th Century. But who in reality is using arguments of a bygone Century? It is an incontrovertible fact of biological science - Make no Mistake that from the moment of conception, a new human life has been created. Only those who allow their emotional passion to override their knowledge can deny it: only those who are irrational or ignorant of science doubt that when a human sperm fertilizes a human ovum a new human being is created. A new human being who carries genes in its cells that make that human being uniquely different from any and other human being and yet, undeniably a member, as we all are, of the great human family. The entire fetus needs to grow into a baby, a child, and an old man, are time, nutrition and a suitable environment. It is determined at that very moment of conception whether the baby will be a boy or a girl; which of his parents he will look like; what blood type he will have. His whole heritage is forever fixed. Look at a human being eight weeks after conception and you, yes every person here who can tell the difference between a man and a women, will be able to look at the fetus and tell me whether it is a baby boy or a girl. Who will pay for there abortions? With Medicare, of course, it is you and I. I know one full pregnancy costs most than an abortion, but not much more. And it does not cost more than three abortions that is what happens when the climate or choice for life or death of the unborn child changes. Let us use this money for constructive purposes, not destructive. It has been suggested that abortions on request would enable the poor to secure abortion as easily as the rich but regrettably, it has been shown that abortion-minded physicians in great demand will respond to the age-old commercial rules, as has already happened in the States and in Britain. Abortion on demand a women's right to choose not to continue an unplanned pregnancy would prevent there being unwanted children in this country, so we are told. This is the final and desperate emotional plea of people anxious, at whatever price, to escape the responsibility for their actions. Nobody here or in Canada, wants there to be unwanted children in this city, and in this country, and also in this world. There is nothing more pitiable or heat rending that an unwanted fetus becoming an unwanted baby or an unwanted baby becoming an unwanted child, or an unwanted child becoming an embittered adult. But few would think it right to kill or have killed an unwanted baby to prevent it from becoming an unwanted child. Then how can they think it right to kill an unwanted fetus, even more defenseless than a newborn baby just because it may grow into an unwanted child. Once a women has conceived, she already is a parent, be it willing or otherwise. The only way she ceases it be a parent is by a natural death or an act of killing. Killing in any form is not the solution to so-called unwanted human beings at any age. Hitler thought this was right. Canadians surely do not. It is a permissive and frightened society that does not develop the expertise to control population, civil disorder, crime, poverty, even its own sexuality but yet would mount

Sunday, November 24, 2019

The Word Love essays

The Word Love essays I have never used the word  ¡Love ¡Ã‚ ¯ to my common college friends. I think that I use the word  ¡Love ¡Ã‚ ¯ to my family (parents, wife expectant baby) and my country when I was in the army; everybody will be patriot when they join the army. In most case, I do not use the word  ¡Love ¡Ã‚ ¯, especially in my college life. However, I love to say  ¡I love ¡Ã‚ ¯ sentence when I speak with English. I was in university for four years in Korea. However I had never been heard of love words and I never said that  ¡I love you, my friend ¡Ã‚ ¯. Most Korean stingy to say a love word to others, include me. Koreans feel abashed in that situation, even if they are husband and wife, most husbands in Korea do not say  ¡I love you, honey ¡Ã‚ ¯ to their wives. I am very surprised that every American people love to say love words in their life. At first, I thought that  ¡Oh, they are full of love, I already like American people! ¡Ã‚ ¯ however, they use it too much to everything. At this time, I cannot trust them when they say  ¡I love ¡Ã‚ ¯ sentence, because that most American love everything, hence I am not sure that they really love it. I barely understand that it is cultural gap between me and American friends. However, now days, when I speak with English with my friends, I usually say that  ¡I love ¡Ã‚ ¯ words. It is very comfortable way to use English; even I think that English made for  ¡Love ¡Ã‚ ¯. Every language has own specification, it is a magic of language I think. What if most people who use English do not say love word when they are talking? It will be awful; because of we already trained with the word  ¡Love ¡Ã‚ ¯ in English. I love to say  ¡I love ¡Ã‚ ¯ sentence when I speak with English, I think that is what American English is. ...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Assignment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 18

Assignment - Essay Example The lines consist of several curves, as well as, loose gestures. The curves are evident on the picture representing the dead Jesus. The belly consists of valley-like curves. Curves are used by artists whose intended messages on pictures are mainly emotionally based. The lines used in this picture are classical or analytical in nature. The lines are precise and are rationally and mathematically organized. The lines are drawn into scale in order to fit the available drawing page. The artist has used expressive lines in the above picture. The element of emotionality is evident in the picture. This was the artist’s intended message. The decoration of the photo, in terms of coloration is also an evident that the artists used expressive lines to come up with the picture. The artist of the above picture has used analytical lines. The lines are straight with no curves. The picture is also fixed in a small frame. This has been done to allow the viewing of all images in the picture. The lines used are expressive. There are several curves in the lines and the artist is trying to bring out an emotional status he/she had when composing the picture. The portrayal of the photo also reveals a lot concerning the emotionality of the photo. 7. Henri has used analytical lines in the designation of this photo. He has used straight lines with no curves. The lines are precise, rational, and mathematically organized. He has ensured that all that he wanted to present in the picture is included. This way, he manages to display his artistic skills. Expressive lines. Mary the artist has applied expressive lines when composing this picture with a view of showing the emotional aspect of the picture to the viewers. The lines are curved showing the image of a woman in 3D format. This enables the viewers comprehend the message behind this picture. Analytic lines have a close relationship with static composition. First, static composition implies